<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StrategicPlanCore StartDate="" EndDate="" Date="2007-09-10"
><Submitter FirstName="Owen" LastName="Ambur" PhoneNumber="" EmailAddress="Owen.Ambur@verizon.net"
/><Source
>http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d20050318nms.pdf</Source
><Organization
><Name
>National Military Strategy of the United States of America</Name
><Acronym
>NMS</Acronym
></Organization
><Mission
>The National Military Strategy (NMS) supports the aims of the National Security&#xD;Strategy (NSS) and implements the National Defense Strategy (NDS). It describes the&#xD;Armed Forces’ plan to achieve military objectives in the near term and provides the&#xD;vision for ensuring they remain decisive in the future.</Mission
><Value
><Name
>Agility</Name
><Description
>It is imperative that the Armed Forces retain the ability to contend with the&#xD;principal characteristic of the security environment – uncertainty. Agility is the&#xD;ability to rapidly deploy, employ, sustain and redeploy capabilities in geographically&#xD;separated and environmentally diverse regions. As commanders conduct operations&#xD;they must consider the effects of surprise and the possibility that their forces may&#xD;have to transition from one type or phase of an operation to another quickly, or&#xD;conduct phases simultaneously, regardless of location. Agility, as a planning&#xD;principle, allows commanders to conduct simultaneous missions while retaining the&#xD;ability to respond to emerging crises. Agility is key to quickly seizing the initiative&#xD;across the range of military operations and ensuring the Armed Forces can act swiftly&#xD;and decisively to protect US interests.</Description
></Value
><Value
><Name
>Decisiveness</Name
><Description
>Decisiveness allows combatant commanders to overwhelm adversaries, control&#xD;situations and achieve definitive outcomes. Decisiveness requires tailored packages&#xD;of joint capabilities designed to achieve specific effects and accomplish objectives.&#xD;Achieving decisiveness may not require large force deployments but rather employing&#xD;capabilities in innovative ways. Transforming the Armed Forces’ capacity to mass&#xD;effects while retaining the ability to mass forces, if needed, is key to achieving&#xD;decisiveness. By focusing on decisive outcomes, combatant commanders can more&#xD;precisely define the effects they must generate and determine the capabilities they&#xD;require.</Description
></Value
><Value
><Name
>Integration</Name
><Description
>Commanders must ensure military activities are integrated effectively with the&#xD;application of other instruments of national and international power to provide focus&#xD;and unity of effort. Integration focuses on fusing and synchronizing military&#xD;operations among the Services, other government agencies, the commercial sector, &#xD;non-governmental organizations and those of partners abroad. Integration does not&#xD;preclude the unilateral use of force, but rather seeks to ensure unity of effort and&#xD;maximize the contribution of partners. Enabling multinational partners through&#xD;security cooperation and other engagement activities enhances the ability of the&#xD;Armed Forces to not only prevent conflict and deter aggression but also supports&#xD;combatant commanders’ plans to quickly undertake operations over great distances&#xD;and in sometimes overlapping conflicts.</Description
></Value
><Goal
><SequenceIndicator
>A</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Protect the United States</Name
><Description
>Today, our first priority is to protect the United States. Joint forces help to&#xD;secure the United States from direct attack through military activities overseas,&#xD;planning and execution of homeland defense and support to civil authorities. Our&#xD;experience in the WOT reinforces the fact that protecting the Nation and its global&#xD;interests requires more than passive defensive measures. The threats posed by&#xD;terrorist groups and rogue states, especially those that gain access to WMD/E,&#xD;mandate an active defense-in-depth. Achieving this objective requires actions to&#xD;counter threats overseas and close to their source; to secure our air, sea, space and&#xD;land territorial approaches; and at home to defend against direct attacks. When&#xD;directed, the Armed Forces provide military support to civil authorities, including&#xD;capabilities to manage the consequences of an attack.</Description
><Stakeholder
/><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>1</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Countering Threats Close to their Source</Name
><Description
>Our primary line of defense remains&#xD;well forward. Forces operating in key regions are essential to the defense of the&#xD;United States and to the protection of allies and US interests. Our theater security&#xD;activities with multinational partners provide access to information and intelligence&#xD;critical to anticipating and understanding new threats. This access supports the&#xD;ability of the United States to project power against threats and support the&#xD;establishment of an environment that reduces the conditions that foster extremist&#xD;ideologies. Our forces, including those rotationally deployed and those stationed&#xD;forward, will work cooperatively with other nations to encourage regional partners to&#xD;eliminate threats and patrol ungoverned space. More directly, deployed military units&#xD;will work closely with international partners and other US government agencies to&#xD;take the battle to the enemy – engaging terrorist forces, terrorist collaborators and&#xD;those governments harboring terrorists.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>2</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Protecting Strategic Approaches</Name
><Description
>The JOC for “Homeland Security” includes&#xD;tasks to protect the United States from direct attack while securing the air, sea, land&#xD;and space approaches to the United States. We will join the efforts of multinational&#xD;partners and other US government agencies to form an integrated defense of the air,&#xD;land, sea and space approaches in and around US sovereign territory. Protecting&#xD;these strategic approaches requires persistent surveillance that allows the United&#xD;States to identify, continuously track and interdict potential threats. This integrated&#xD;defense is essential to securing strategic access and retaining US freedom of action.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>3</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Defensive Actions at Home</Name
><Description
>While we will attempt to counter threats close to&#xD;their source and interdict them along the strategic approaches, we must retain the&#xD;ability to defend the United States from an attack that penetrates our forward&#xD;defenses. At home the Armed Forces must defend the United States against air and&#xD;missile attacks, terrorism and other direct attacks. As necessary, the Armed Forces&#xD;will protect critical infrastructure that supports our ability to project military power.&#xD;When directed, the Armed Forces will temporarily employ military capabilities to&#xD;support law enforcement agencies during special events. During emergencies the&#xD;Armed Forces may provide military support to civil authorities in mitigating the&#xD;consequences of an attack or other catastrophic event when civilian responders are&#xD;overwhelmed. Military responses under these conditions require a streamlined chainof-&#xD;command that integrates the unique capabilities of active and reserve military&#xD;components and civilian responders. Effective defense in the face of adaptive&#xD;adversaries will also require the exploitation of future technologies to improve&#xD;capabilities to rapidly detect, assess and interdict WMD/E and emerging threats.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>4</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Creating a Global Anti-Terrorism Environment</Name
><Description
>In addition to defending the&#xD;US homeland and supporting civil authorities, our strategy will diminish the&#xD;conditions that permit terrorism to flourish. To defeat terrorists we will support&#xD;national and partner nation efforts to deny state sponsorship, support, and sanctuary&#xD;to terrorist organizations. We will work to deny terrorists safe haven in failed states&#xD;and ungoverned regions. Working with other nations’ militaries and other&#xD;governmental agencies, the Armed Forces help to establish favorable security&#xD;conditions and increase the capabilities of partners. The relationships developed in&#xD;these interactions contribute to a global antiterrorism environment that further&#xD;reduces threats to the United States, its allies and its interests. For example,&#xD;intelligence partnerships with other nations can take advantage of foreign expertise&#xD;and areas of focus and provide access to previously denied areas. These relationships&#xD;are essential mission components to protecting the United States, contributing to&#xD;deterrence and conflict prevention, as well as preventing surprise attacks.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
></Goal
><Goal
><Description
/><Stakeholder
/><Objective
><Description
/><Stakeholder
/></Objective
></Goal
><Goal
><SequenceIndicator
>B</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Prevent Conflict and Surprise Attacks</Name
><Description
>The United States must prevent conflict and surprise attacks through actions that&#xD;deter aggression and coercion while retaining the capability to act promptly in&#xD;defending the nation. Preventing conflict and deterring aggression rely in large part&#xD;on an integrated overseas presence. Overseas, US forces permanently based in&#xD;strategically important areas, rotationally deployed forward in support of regional&#xD;objectives, and temporarily deployed during contingencies convey a credible message&#xD;that the United States remains committed to preventing conflict. These forces also&#xD;clearly demonstrate that the United States will react forcefully should an adversary&#xD;threaten the United States, its interests, allies and partners. The United States must&#xD;remain vigilant in identifying conditions that can lead to conflict in anticipating&#xD;adversary actions and in reacting more swiftly than in the past. The Joint Force will&#xD;deploy forward with a purpose – on the ground, in the air, in space and at sea – and&#xD;work with other nations to promote security and to deter aggression. Preventing&#xD;conflict and surprise attacks requires that the Armed Forces take action to ensure&#xD;strategic access, establish favorable security conditions and work to increase the&#xD;capabilities of partners to protect common security interests.</Description
><Stakeholder
/><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>1</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Forward Posture and Presence</Name
><Description
>Increasing the capabilities of partners and their&#xD;willingness to cooperate in operations that ensure regional security requires an&#xD;integrated, global view of our long-term strategy and enhancements to our overseas&#xD;military posture. Combatant commanders, employing a mix of forward stationed,&#xD;rotational and temporarily deployed capabilities tailored to perform specific missions,&#xD;improve our ability to act within and across borders, strengthen the role of partners&#xD;and expand joint and multinational capabilities. Posture and presence&#xD;enhancements also serve to assure our friends; improve the ability to prosecute the&#xD;WOT; deter, dissuade and defeat other threats; and support transformation. These&#xD;changes, developed in anticipation of future threats, help to ensure strategic access&#xD;to key regions and lines of communications critical to US security and sustaining&#xD;operations throughout the battlespace. Within the process of adjusting our overseas&#xD;presence, combatant commanders must develop and recommend posture&#xD;adjustments that enable expeditionary, joint, and multinational forces to act promptly&#xD;and globally while establishing favorable security conditions. The value and utility of&#xD;having forces forward goes beyond winning on the battlefield. Employing forces in&#xD;instances short of war demonstrates the United States’ willingness to lead and&#xD;encourages others to help defend, preserve and extend the peace.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>2</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Promote Security</Name
><Description
>The visible and purposeful presence of US military&#xD;capabilities is an integral part of an active global strategy to ensure security and&#xD;stability. Military forces engage in security cooperation (SC) activities to establish&#xD;important military interactions, building trust and confidence between the United&#xD;States and its multinational partners. These relatively small investments often&#xD;produce results that far exceed their cost.&#xD;SC complements other national-level efforts to prevent conflict and promote&#xD;mutual security interests. These activities encourage nations to develop, modernize&#xD;and transform their own capabilities, thereby increasing the capabilities of partners&#xD;and helping them to help themselves. SC helps resolve doctrinal employment&#xD;differences among military counterparts, enhances important intelligence and&#xD;communication linkages and facilitates rapid crisis response. Active SC contributes&#xD;to stability in key areas of the world while dissuading potential adversaries from&#xD;adopting courses of action that threaten stability and security. In this way, we&#xD;facilitate the integration of military operations with allies, contribute to regional&#xD;stability, reduce underlying conditions that foment extremism and set the conditions&#xD;for future success.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>3</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Deterring Aggression</Name
><Description
>Deterrence rests on an adversary understanding that the&#xD;United States has an unquestioned ability to deny strategic objectives and to impose&#xD;severe consequences in response to hostile or potentially hostile actions. Deterring&#xD;aggression and coercion must be anticipatory in nature to prevent the catastrophic&#xD;impact of attacks using biological, chemical or nuclear weapons on civilian&#xD;population centers in the United States or in partner nations. The Armed Forces&#xD;have the capability to exercise flexible deterrent options (FDOs) with appropriate&#xD;combat power to defuse a crisis or force an adversary to reevaluate its courses of&#xD;action. Combatant commanders build upon the capabilities of early arriving FDOs to&#xD;support the swift defeat of an adversary when necessary. Moreover, they employ&#xD;capabilities to establish favorable security conditions in which other, non-military&#xD;FDOs can succeed.&#xD;Effective deterrence requires a strategic communication plan that emphasizes the&#xD;willingness of the United States to employ force in defense of its interests. Combatant&#xD;commander participation is essential in developing a strategic communication plan&#xD;that conveys US intent and objectives, and ensures the success of the plan by&#xD;countering adversary disinformation and misinformation. Such strategic&#xD;communication can help avoid conflict or deescalate tensions among adversaries.&#xD;The United States requires a broad set of options to discourage aggression and&#xD;coercion. Nuclear capabilities continue to play an important role in deterrence by&#xD;providing military options to deter a range of threats, including the use of WMD/E&#xD;and large-scale conventional forces. Additionally, the extension of a credible nuclear&#xD;deterrent to allies has been an important nonproliferation tool that has removed&#xD;incentives for allies to develop and deploy nuclear forces. Deterring aggression by a&#xD;wider range of adversaries requires transforming existing US strategic nuclear forces&#xD;into a new triad composed of a diverse portfolio of capabilities. This new model for&#xD;strategic deterrence includes non-nuclear and nuclear strike forces, active and&#xD;passive defenses, as well as infrastructure to build and maintain the force.&#xD;Improvements and enhancements to non-nuclear strike capabilities, information&#xD;operations, command and control, intelligence and space forces will contribute to a&#xD;more robust and effective deterrent capability. Future advances in targeting and&#xD;precision will provide the capabilities necessary to defeat a wider range of targets&#xD;while reducing collateral damage.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>4</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Preventing Surprise Attacks</Name
><Description
>Military forces can no longer focus solely on&#xD;responding to aggression. The potentially horrific consequences of an attack against&#xD;the United States demand action to secure the Nation from direct attack by&#xD;eliminating certain threats before they can strike. Deterring threats and preventing&#xD;surprise attacks will place increasing demands on intelligence assets, the agility and&#xD;decisiveness of the force and the ability to work time-critical issues in the interagency&#xD;setting. Preventative missions require shared, “actionable” intelligence, and rules of&#xD;engagement that allow commanders to make timely decisions. This decision making&#xD;process stresses collaboration, speed and responsiveness – key ingredients required&#xD;when exploiting time-sensitive opportunities as they arise, especially against mobile,&#xD;time critical targets. These missions require exacting analysis and synthesis of&#xD;intelligence gathered by a combination of capabilities, including human and technical&#xD;collectors. These operations will generally involve coordinated efforts with other&#xD;agencies and departments in the US government, placing a premium on information&#xD;sharing, intelligence fusion and collaborative planning.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
></Goal
><Goal
><SequenceIndicator
>C</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Prevail Against Adversaries</Name
><Description
>When necessary, the Armed Forces will defeat adversaries. Developments in the&#xD;security environment necessitate a Joint Force that can achieve tactical and&#xD;operational success and prevail in a manner that establishes favorable security&#xD;conditions and ensures enduring victories. Terrorist attacks demonstrate that&#xD;conflict is not limited to geographic borders and that defeating root causes of&#xD;terrorism requires a total national effort. The United States will constantly strive to&#xD;enlist the support of the international community and increase the capabilities of&#xD;partners to contend with common challenges, but will not hesitate to act alone, if&#xD;necessary.</Description
><Stakeholder
/><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>1</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Swiftly Defeat Adversaries</Name
><Description
>Some operation plans will focus on achieving a&#xD;limited set of objectives. Commanders’ plans to swiftly defeat adversaries will include&#xD;options to: alter the unacceptable behavior or policies of states; rapidly seize the&#xD;initiative or prevent conflict escalation; deny an adversary sanctuary, defeat his&#xD;offensive capabilities or objectives; and provide support to post-conflict stability. In&#xD;each case, the Joint Force must combine speed, agility and superior warfighting&#xD;ability to generate decisive effects. Moving forces into multiple geographic locations&#xD;will require assured strategic access as well as strategic and tactical lift systems&#xD;robust enough to conduct and sustain multiple, simultaneous operations. Swiftly&#xD;defeating adversaries in overlapping operations will require the ability to quickly&#xD;reconstitute, reconfigure and redeploy forces to conduct another campaign.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>2</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Win Decisively</Name
><Description
>Where necessary, commanders’ plans will include options to&#xD;rapidly transition to a campaign to win decisively and achieve enduring results. The&#xD;capabilities required for major combat operations must be applicable to the full&#xD;spectrum of threats ranging from state to non-state adversaries employing traditional&#xD;and/or asymmetric capabilities. A campaign to win decisively will include actions to:&#xD;destroy an adversary’s military capabilities through the integrated application of air,&#xD;ground, maritime, space and information capabilities; and potentially remove&#xD;adversary regimes when directed. Such campaigns require capabilities for&#xD;conventional warfighting, unconventional warfare, homeland security, stability and&#xD;post-conflict operations, countering terrorism and security cooperation activities.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
><Objective
><SequenceIndicator
>3</SequenceIndicator
><Name
>Stability Operations</Name
><Description
>Winning decisively will require synchronizing and&#xD;integrating major combat operations, stability operations and significant post-conflict&#xD;interagency operations to establish conditions of stability and security favorable to&#xD;the United States. The Joint Force must be able to transition from major combat&#xD;operations to stability operations and to conduct those operations simultaneously. At&#xD;the operational level, military post-conflict operations will integrate conflict&#xD;termination objectives with diplomatic, economic, financial, intelligence, law&#xD;enforcement and information efforts. Joint forces will, where appropriate,&#xD;synchronize and coordinate their operations and activities with international partners&#xD;and non-governmental organizations. These missions render other instruments of&#xD;national power more effective and set the conditions for long-term regional stability&#xD;and sustainable development.</Description
><Stakeholder
/></Objective
></Goal
></StrategicPlanCore
>